f \in L^1 \iff \sum_{k=-\infty}^\infty 2^k m(F_k) < \infty \iff \sum_{k=-\infty}^\infty 2^k m(E_{2^k}) < \infty Denote these conditions as a, b, and c respectively. Proof of this statement needs to be broken up into four parts:
Part 1: a \Rightarrow b. Simply observe that: \sum_{k=-\infty}^\infty 2^k m(F_k) \hspace{0.25cm} =\hspace{0.25cm} \sum_{k=-\infty}^\infty \int_{F_k} 2^k dx \hspace{0.25cm} \leq \ldots \ldots \leq \hspace{0.25cm} \sum_{k=-\infty}^\infty \int_{F_k} f(x) dx \hspace{0.25cm} = \hspace{0.25cm} \int_{\mathbb{R}^d} f(x)dx < \infty Part 2: b \Rightarrow a. Similarly: \frac{1}{2} \int_{\mathbb{R}^d} f(x)dx \hspace{0.25cm} \leq \hspace{0.25cm} \frac{1}{2} \sum_{k=-\infty}^\infty \int_{F_k} f(x) dx \leq \ldots \ldots \leq \hspace{0.25cm} \frac{1}{2} \sum_{k=-\infty}^\infty \int_{F_k} 2^{k+1} dx = \sum_{k=-\infty}^\infty 2^{k} m(F_k) < \infty Part 3: c \Rightarrow b. Certainly, F_k \subset E_{2^k}. Thus: \sum_{k=-\infty}^\infty 2^{k} m(F_k) \leq \sum_{k=-\infty}^\infty 2^{k} m(E_{2^k}) < \infty Part 4: b \Rightarrow c. First observe that E_{2^k} = \bigcup_{n=k}^\infty F_k. Indeed, \sum_{k=-\infty}^\infty 2^{k} m(E_{2^k}) \leq \sum_{k=-\infty}^\infty \sum_{n=k}^\infty 2^{k} m(F_{n}) = \ldots ...(by Fubini's Theorem) \ldots = \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty \sum_{k=-\infty}^n 2^{k} m(F_{n}) = \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty \Bigg(2^n m(F_n) \sum_{k=-\infty}^n 2^{k-n} \Bigg) = \ldots \ldots = \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty 2^{n+1} m(F_n) < \infty Thus, a \iff b \iff c, as desired.
The second half of the exercise wants us to investigate the following functions:
f(x) = \Bigg\lbrace \begin{array}{cc} |x|^{-a} & |x| \leq 1 & \\ 0 & \text{otherwise} \\ \end{array} | and | g(x) = \Bigg\lbrace \begin{array}{cc} |x|^{-b} & |x| > 1 & \\ 0 & \text{otherwise} \\ \end{array} |
Where B is the closed unit ball centered at the origin.
For the first function, notice that after solving for |x|, the sets E_{2^k}, where k \geq 0 are: E_{2^k} = \lbrace x \hspace{0.25cm} | \hspace{0.25cm} |x| < 2^{-\frac{k}{a}} \rbrace I.e. for positive k, m(E_{2^k}) = v_d (2^{-\frac{k}{a}})^d. Notice also that for k < 0, m(E_{2^k}) = v_d. Thus, \sum_{k=-\infty}^\infty 2^k m(E_{2^k}) = \sum_{k=-\infty}^0 v_d 2^k + \sum_{k=1}^\infty 2^k v_d (2^{-\frac{k}{a}})^d = \ldots \ldots = 2v_d + \sum_{k=1}^\infty v_d 2^{k(1-\frac{d}{a})} ...which will only converge if d > a. Thus, if d > a, f(x) is L^1.
For the second function, for -\infty < k < 0: E_{2^k} = \lbrace x \hspace{0.25cm} | \hspace{0.25cm} |x| < 2^{-\frac{k}{b}} \rbrace Similar to before, notice that for k \geq 0, m(E_{2^k}) = 0. Thus,: \sum_{k=-\infty}^\infty 2^k m(E_{2^k}) = \sum_{k=-\infty}^{-1} 2^k v_d (2^{-\frac{k}{b}})^d = \sum_{k=-\infty}^{-1} v_d 2^{k(1 -\frac{d}{b})} ...which will clearly only converge if d < b. Thus, g(x) is L^1 if d < b.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteIn proving (b) => (c), I believe you have to also consider if f(x) is infinite, since it won't be contained in any F_k. However, this additional step isn't too difficult, and we proved earlier that (b) <=> (a), which means f is integrable, meaning the measure of Q is 0, so the proof is otherwise identical.
ReplyDeleteI also think that when it comes to showing the integrability of the second function, E_k is the open ball of radius 2^{-k/b} excluding the closed unit ball, meaning the measure of E_k is actually v_d*(2^{-k/b})^d - v_d, so you'll have an extra sum that simplifies to just v_d in the end. Again, the proof is otherwise identical.
Delete